DFSATLAS

DFS Atlas vs Stokastic — contest results vs projection models

Quick answer: Stokastic sells projection and ownership forecasts from a deep model bench — what the models think will happen tonight. DFS Atlas shows what DID happen: the real lineups that won DraftKings contests, field ownership versus top-1% ownership per player, and the full prize ladder for every indexed slate. Forecasts versus the record.

Head to head

DFS AtlasStokastic
What it isDraftKings contest results archive + drill-downsProjection and ownership forecast models
Core dataReal contest entries: lineups, ownership, winnersModel-generated projections and forecasts
Ownership edgeField vs top-1% finisher ownership, per playerForecasted ownership
Lineup researchThe actual top lineups that cashedModel-built lineups
Prize dataFull prize ladder per contestContest selection guidance
CostEarly access — 2020\u20132026 lake at launchSubscription tiers
Best forLearning from what wonAnticipating tonight\u2019s field

Why researchers use DFS Atlas

Where Stokastic wins — honestly

Stokastic is stronger on the forward-looking side: multi-model projections, forecasted ownership and content built around tonight\u2019s slate. A results archive doesn\u2019t predict anything — if you need tonight\u2019s numbers before kickoff, that\u2019s their lane.

FAQ

Does DFS Atlas have projections?
No — DFS Atlas is a results lake from real DraftKings contests. Projection products like Stokastic are the complement, not the competitor.

Which is better for contest selection?
Both together: Stokastic forecasts the field, DFS Atlas shows how contests of similar structure and size actually paid out.

Is the ownership data real?
Yes — every ownership row is measured from an actual contest\u2019s entries, not modeled.

Explore the lake yourself

Every indexed contest: prize ladder, most-owned players, field ownership vs top-1% finishers, and the lineups that actually cashed.

OPEN THE CONTEST EXPLORER — DFS ATLAS